Home / Blog / A Reward Increase in an Unsolved Buckeye

A Reward Increase in an Unsolved Buckeye Hit-and-Run: What a Family Can Still Do Under Arizona Law

12 News reports that the reward in a 2020 hit-and-run death in Buckeye has been increased to $50,000. According to the outlet, a person was found dead in the median on I-10 near Watson Road. No driver has been publicly identified, and no one has been charged or convicted in connection with the death.

A hit-and-run that kills a pedestrian in Arizona creates two tracks that move independently. The criminal track belongs to the state; leaving the scene of a collision involving death or injury is a felony under A.R.S. § 28-661, and a reward offer signals that investigators still need a witness to come forward. The civil track belongs to the family. Arizona's wrongful death statutes, A.R.S. § 12-611 through A.R.S. § 12-613, let a surviving spouse, child, or parent, or the personal representative of the estate, sue for the losses the death caused. Most of those claims must be filed within two years under A.R.S. § 12-542, and that clock generally runs from the date of death, not the date police identify a suspect. Uninsured motorist coverage on a household auto policy often applies when the driver is never found, because an unidentified driver is treated as uninsured. Filing deadlines in the policy are usually shorter.

When the Driver Is Never Identified, the Claim Usually Runs Through Insurance

Families often assume that an unsolved hit-and-run means no civil recovery. That is frequently wrong. Uninsured motorist coverage is designed for exactly this situation: a driver who cannot be located cannot be made to pay, so the policy steps into that driver's place. Coverage can come from a policy in the household, including one that covered the person who died as a resident relative, even if that person was walking and not driving at the time.

Two practical points matter. First, read the policy's notice and suit provisions; they are contractual and can be far shorter than the two-year statutory period in A.R.S. § 12-542. Second, insurers handling unidentified-driver claims sometimes argue that the pedestrian contributed to the collision. Arizona uses pure comparative fault under A.R.S. § 12-2505, which means a recovery is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the injured person but is not eliminated. A disputed fault percentage is a reason to document the claim carefully, not a reason to walk away from it.

Deadlines Do Not Pause While an Investigation Stays Open

An open criminal investigation does not extend the civil deadline. If the death gives rise to a wrongful death claim under A.R.S. § 12-611 through A.R.S. § 12-613, or to a survival claim for the decedent's own losses under A.R.S. § 14-3110, those claims are measured by their own statutes. Under A.R.S. § 12-542, two years is the general limit.

One deadline is much shorter and catches families by surprise. If any claim will be made against a public entity or a public employee, A.R.S. § 12-821.01 requires a written notice of claim served within 180 days of when the claim accrues. Missing that notice can bar the claim entirely, regardless of its merits. Wrongful death claims also generally must be brought by a statutory beneficiary or by the personal representative of the estate, so opening a probate estate is often a necessary first step rather than an afterthought.

Practical Steps in an Unsolved Hit-and-Run

Evidence in these cases degrades quickly, and in older cases much of it is already gone. What remains is usually worth pursuing.

  • Request the full investigative file, not just the face sheet of the report. Supplements, scene diagrams, and photographs often contain details that never appeared in news coverage.
  • Identify every auto policy in the household and send written notice of a potential uninsured motorist claim. Do this even if you are unsure whether coverage applies.
  • Preserve anything the family already has: phone records, messages, the decedent's clothing and personal property, and the names of anyone who spoke with investigators.
  • Do not give a recorded statement to an insurer about fault before you understand how comparative fault under A.R.S. § 12-2505 could be used against the claim.
  • Route tips to law enforcement rather than investigating independently. A reward is intended to produce a witness; contaminating that process can hurt both the criminal case and the civil one.

If your family is dealing with a pedestrian death or serious injury in the West Valley, our Buckeye pedestrian accident attorneys can explain which deadlines apply to your situation and what coverage may be available.